Sacramento County Superior Court has four courtrooms that handle petitions for writ of administrative mandamus, Department 24, Department 29, Department 31 and Department 42. No reply or closing memorandum may exceed 10 pages. ) 11 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ) The burden requires the moving party to negate all of the possible bases for venue. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 13 TENTATIVE RULING MORE 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 5 (Subd (h) amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as subd (e) effective July 1, 2000; previously amended and relettered as subd (f) effective January 1, 2004, and as subd (h) effective January 1, 2007.). 11 ) ) (415) 551-5910, Court Supervisor - Office Staff ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The court decides these applications without a hearing. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 Print | E-mail Civic Center Courthouse ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: APPOINTMENT OF CLER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (2) If a California case is cited before the time it is published in the advance sheets of the Official Reports, the party must include the title, case number, date of decision, and, if from the Court of Appeal, district of the Court of Appeal in which the case was decided. Regarding the FIs, a party responding to an interrogatory must provide a response that is as complete and straightforward as the information reasonably available to the responding party permits and [i]f an interrogatory cannot be answered completely, it shall be answered to the extent possible. CCP 2030.220(a)-(b). ) Call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel. 4:21-22; 5:22-23. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) The Court will be transitioning to Zoom for all remote appearances. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT If a responding party is not able to comply with a particular request, that party shall affirm that a diligent search and a reasonable inquiry has been made in an effort to comply with that demand. CCP 2031.230. CCP 396b(a). ) 11 ) Attorneys will NOT advise clients on the laws of any State or any State law legal matters (with the exception of California). 11 ) ) 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The Court clearly has jurisdiction over Defendant as trustee, as he is properly named in the FAC, he is properly served, and he is adequately named in the default in this capacity. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 9 GLORIA KATIA FLORES ALCA, ) Department: 404 ) (CRC 3.1322.) ) ) ) (1993) 18 Cal.App.4th 919, 933; see also Britt v. Sup.Ct. ) 6 JESSE H KONIUK, ) Case Number: FDI-21-794578 ) ) Plaintiffs David Pelayo, Roberto Hernandez, Edmond Andre, Bryan Munoz and Brian Medeiros (Plaintiffs), filed the complaint in this action against Utility Partners of America, LLC (UPA or Defendant) arising out of alleged violations of employment law (the Complaint). ) Jerry's Shell v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC(2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073. ) 5 9 THABITI HAYES, ) Department: 404 9 EDGAR R GUZMAN, ) Department: 403 ) Civil Law & Motion Tentative Rulings Effective January 1, 2021, San Mateo Superior Court is a direct calendar court for all Civil Matters. If in electronic form, the authority must be electronically bookmarked as required by rule 3.1110(f)(4). Moreover, as Defendant points out, Plaintiff put Joes condition, and thus the records and information, directly at issue. ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: RESPONDENT TO ENROLL PETIT 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Find electronic and print forms for court and sample legal agreements at the San Francisco Law Library. There is no requirement to meet and confer prior to filing a motion to compel where there has been no response to discovery requests. Ct. (1969) 273 Cal.App.2d 7, 8-9. 5 Experience. 13 TENTATIV 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) You can always see your envelopes 9 HANNAH YUIN YEE LEONG, ) Department: 404 (See Barris v. County of Los Angeles (1999) 20 Cal.4th 101.) Attn: Appellate Court Services. The Court finds that a total of three hours across two motions at the reasonable rate of $495/hr is appropriate, plus $60 of filing fees per motion are all reasonable. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) ) ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Courtroom I. Pro. The Court is predominantly seeking attorneys interested in assisting incarcerated individuals with their civil actions. ) 11 ) (MP&A pp. 11 ) 10 COLETTE WHORISKEY, ) Department: 404 The advantage of filing in Los Angeles County Superior Court is the convenient access to the court for individuals living in southern California. If in paper form, the copy must be tabbed or separated as required by rule 3.1110(f)(3). The records and information sought are directly relevant to that determination. ) Based on the foregoing, the Motion is GRANTED. Dept. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, The California Rules of Court state how to prepare and when to file documents. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 ) For information about a direct calendar departments hearing dates and schedules for law and motion and ex parte applications, go to theeCourt Public Portal. Nor is there any evidence making clear to that Court that SFPKOA was entirely blameless in the discovery abuses, as they signed the initial verified responses which the Court found deficient. Guide to the San Francisco Superior Court. The Court usually issues tentative rulings two days before most law and motion matters. Ellis v. Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.(2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 853, 878. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Clinic, Inc. v. Sup.Ct. ) 9 CLIFFORD GADYE, ) Department: 404 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Plaintiff filed a motion for OSC re Contempt and Sanctions on January 14, 2022, alleging in part that no supplemental responses had been served in violation of the Courts September 3, 2021 order. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 Lebowitz Dec. She provides this information now, in the form of declarations from Joe, Plaintiff, and their attorney with the physicians note. 11 ) 12 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE Z; REQUEST FOR ORDER R 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The opposition and the reply both merit consideration. ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Law and motion and ex parte applications in a direct calendar case are heard in the department to which the case was assigned. ) It has no discretion. Iott v. Franklin(1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 521, 528. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Attorneys offices are only located in California. ) However, falsity, must be demonstrated by reference to the pleading itself of judicially noticeable matters, not extraneous facts. CCP 1292.2. You can also postpone your jury duty electronically, by logging into the jury system using your Juror ID and PIN provided to you on your jury summons. ) JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. CCP 2031.300(c) & 2033.280(c). Dept. 5 ) ) If a party timely brings such a motion, the court must transfer the action if it finds that the court is not a proper court. 5 The protection is not absolute, however, and the information is discoverable where the need for discovery outweighs the privacy concerns. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Food 4 Less Supermarkets, Inc. v. Superior Court(1995) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657. (Chan) (1997) 57 CA4th 1546, 1551, 67 CR2d 804, 807 (disapproved on other grounds by Wilcox v. Birtwhistle (1999) 21 Cal.4th 973, 982, fn. ) ) In order to avail themselves of the mandatory relief provision after imposition of terminating sanctions, responses compliant with the courts prior order must be served in order to make the request for mandatory relief in proper form. 6 JENNIFER PUENTE, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792728 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DETERMINATION OF PREVAILI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Last. 12 REVIEW HEARING ON STEP UP VISITATION TO OVE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Room 402 11 ) ) ) This is wholly insufficient to inform the court or Plaintiff of exactly which allegations are at issue. ) ) (I)f a party fails to show that a judgment has been taken against him through his mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect the court may not grant relief. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SEAL UNREDACTED RESPONSIVE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Law and motion and ex parte applications in all other cases, including unlawful detainers, are heard in Department 511. Reputation. ) ) ) 9 TIMOTHY HEFFERNAN, ) Department: 403 Law and motion and ex parte applications in a direct calendar case are heard in the department to which the case was assigned. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT On November 9, 2022, this motion was continued because there was no proof of service showing notice of the hearing and the service was electronic, but Plaintiff is self represented, making such service ineffective absent agreement. ) 96, llc atique rehman sarahann shapiro joseph k. bravo plaintiff's motion for summary judgment tentative ruling: parties to appear posted: 3:00 pm 9 ULRICH SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Department: 403 ) Ct. (Marshalls of CA, LLC) (2017) 3 Cal. 6 CHRISTOPHER BROWN, ) Case Number: FLD-22-396948 11 ) ) Time of Hearing All limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. A party to whom a document demand is directed must respond to each item in the demand with an agreement to comply, a representation of inability to comply, or an objection. ***, Collections Covid-19 Information and FAQs, Family Law Covid-19 Information and Update, Jury Services Covid-19 Information and FAQs, Traffic Division COVID-19 Information & Update, Previous Orders, Notices & Press Releases By Year, https://us02web.zoom.us/j/85708488569?pwd=MzAvL3o3U2g4ck5SZTN3cXEyNllOQT09. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 ) ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT (Central Pathology Service Med. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 13, 2022 On January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed an opposition. ) 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-11-346715 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 However, per CCP 1005, Plaintiffs opposition was due nine court days prior to hearing, and Plaintiff filed his opposition only seven days prior. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT CCP 396b(a), 397(a). 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) CCP 412.20(a) states in relevant part that a summons must be directed to the defendant. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 Further these actions are already pled in the prayer for relief. (MP&A p. They must do more than show the possibility it may lead to relevant information. CCP 1292(a) & 1292.2. Dawes v. Superior Court(1980) 111 Cal.App.3d 82, 89-90 (Dawes). There is a fee payable for the motion at the time of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file. Department rules are available here. See, e.g. Strategic discovery misconduct resulting in terminating sanctions is not a proper basis for mandatory relief under CCP 473(b). ) 6 UPAs attorneys recalcitrance toward the entire process indicates to the Court that this discovery abuse appears to stem in part from the actions of counsel. Britt, supra, 20 Cal.3d 859-862. 3 ) Valley Bank of Nevada v. Sup.Ct. give notice of the hearing date as required by law. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Defaults: (415) 551-5921 or (415) 551-5969. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) See Rodriguez v. Brill(2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and Motion Departments. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5 ) It is not limited to claims for medical malpractice and covers any claim directly related to the professional services provided. San Francisco, California 94102-3688. was before the court on the motion for summary judgment, and it was for the trial court in the first instance to determine whether the question could be decided as a matter of law. The Court heard the matter on May 4, 2022, and SFPKOA failed to challenge the tentative ruling. SFSC LR 8.1 (amended eff 7/1/21). ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 CYNTHIA CHERIN, ) Department: 403 The Motion is GRANTED. ) ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH However, the assertion that Doctor Laird is an independent contractor is not a fact that is apparent based on the face of the pleading or that has been judicial noticed by this court. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ( Cal. ) G. D. Searle & Co. v. Superior Court(1975) 49 Cal.App.3d 22, 28. ) 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) Plaintiffs request for sanctions is GRANTED. Court Clerk 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5 5 ) (i) effective January 1, 2008; previously amended effective July 1, 1997, July 1, 2011, and January 1, 2016.). 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 13 TENTATIVE RULING 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DETERMINATION OF PREVAILIN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 13 TENTATIVE RULING ) 6 REBECCA REBECCA SKINNER, ) Case Number: FDI-06-762767 Valley Bank of Nevada, supra, 15 Cal.3d 658. Where no response was served to a RPOD, there is no time requirement in moving to compel, nor any requirement to show good cause for the production requested. Filter by a specific county without spaces. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Before Trial Ch. ) ) ) Huh v. Wang(2007) 158 Cal.App.4th 1406, 1423. 195.). ) ) The court must not require any other form of citation. Beginning June 15, 2021, all courthouses are open to the public and most in-person services are restored. Oppression means despicable conduct that subjects a person to cruel and unjust hardship in conscious disregard of that person's rights. 6 CHRISTOPHER JAMES RIVERS, ) Case Number: FMS-17-387056 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) 12 ) 11 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD CUSTO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) ) It is clear that the Court has no jurisdiction over Defendant as an individual. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 apply to ex parte applications. SFPKOA has made no showing that this matter is properly under the mandatory relief provisions of CCP 473(b). 11 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Moreover, both Plaintiff and Joe describe the conditions, a combination of age, pre-diabetes, and high blood pressure. (415) 551-3750, Judge Susan M. Breall ) A motion to strike is also properly directed to unauthorized claims for damages, meaning damages which are not allowable as a matter of law. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 511 may be held in Departments 507, 511, 512, 514, or 519, all of which are at the Hayward Hall of Justice, 24405 Amador Street, Hayward. 9 DEVENE TOBIE, ) Department: 403 ) CCP sections 1985.3(g), 1985.6(f)(4). 11 ) 11 ) 5 5 See also rule 1.200 concerning the format of citations. 11 ) ) 11 ) ) He alleges that this has resulted in permanent injuries. CCP 1292.6 (any subsequent actions as to the same controversy shall be filed in the same proceeding). ) ) 6 ELIZABETH MORRIS, ) Case Number: FDI-13-780247 While Plaintiff alleges outrageous and prejudicial conduct, he fails to allege extreme conduct by SRMH, which is an essential element of the cause of action. Plaintiff seeks $1,500 for two motions, representing expended attorney time and fees. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES The San Francisco Superior Court offers online access to Tentative Rulings for Civil and Family Law matters. 5 See CCP 437. Applications to Stay Evictionscan be filed at any court location that accepts civil filings: - Ren C. Davidson Courthouse (Oakland), and. Aside from the prayer for attorney fees and cost of suit, it fails to specify the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks the court to strike. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING (1979) 99 Cal.App.3d 283, 288. It is now for . ) 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM I like all the marble too. ) ) 12 ATTORNEY'S FEES AND REVIEW OF DISSOULITION 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH ) The assignment of the case depends on the case number assigned by the clerks office. 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) (CCP 1010.6; California Rule of Court (CRC) 2.251(c)(3)(B).) 11 ) After all, while Joes condition may be at issue, the claims do not hinge on the details of that condition but on the reasonableness and correctness of Defendants conduct. 5 13 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHAN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) As the default is void for lack of jurisdiction over the Defendant in his individual capacity, the default does bear correcting and Defendant is entitled to his relief to that limited degree. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER: ATTY FEES/COSTS, ADVANCE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO With this limitation, the court GRANTS the requests for judicial notice. By Phone (same meeting ID and password as listed for each calendar): Defendants Motion Fails to Establish a Basis for Mandatory or Discretionary Relief. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) CCP . 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Time of Hearing. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER SPOUSAL OR PARTNER SUPPORT After extensions, SFPKOA served responses on May 25, 2021. Food 4 Less Supermarkets, Inc. v. Superior Court(1995) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657. 11 ) Department 22. Joseph Winer (Winer), in order to determine the validity of Plaintiffs claims that Joes condition warranted the requested accommodation. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES The County's Probation Department handles Juvenile Traffic cases NOT the Superior . 6 RICARDO ANTONIO ALVAREZ, ) Case Number: FDI-10-772130 ) The Hon. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH Law (9th ed. ) 5 5 5 ) 11 ) ) It is worth noting that Defendants reply asserting this point was also late, filed only four court days prior to hearing. 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM (Subd (f) amended and lettered effective January 1, 2007; adopted as part of subd (d); subd (d) previously amended and relettered as subd (e) effective January 1, 2004), (g) Effect of filing an oversized memorandum. Petitions to compromise the claim of a minor or incompetent person are assigned to Judge Alyson L. Lewis in Department 34. ) ) Quick Links 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER BIFURCATION FOR STATUS ONLY D 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Leave a message with the following information: Your name, and that you want to appear. ) ) 6 JENNIFER SANDELIN, ) Case Number: FDV-15-811822 Plaintiffs motion was granted by the Court as to all requests, and monetary sanctions were imposed. 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Dawes, supra, 111 Cal.App.3d at 90. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of discovery responses. 9 KEVIN OMAR LASTRE, ) Department: 403 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 5 ) ) Plaintiff Gloria Aguilera (Plaintiff), filed the complaint against defendants Baltazar Lopez Guzman, Arnulfo Garcia Mendoza (together Defendants) along with Does 1-100, arising out of an automobile related incident (the Complaint). 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING ) 9 XUE YING YANG, ) Department: 403 ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ENFORCE RESPONDE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DEFAULT PROVE UP HEARING RE R 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Plaintiffs have not shown argued or indicated that the objections present in the current motion are new, or were not asserted in the original discovery responses. Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2023, 2023 Superior Court of California - County of San Francisco, Caf at Civic Center Courthouse - Starchef, Information Regarding Coronavirus and Court Operations, Local Rules of Court Effective July 1, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective May 10, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective April 1, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2022, Local Rules of CourtEffective July1, 2021, Local Rules of CourtEffective January 1, 2021, Local Rules of Court Effective July 1, 2020, Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2020. ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 ) Board of Med. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT All limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. Exchange(2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 1138, 1144. ) Criminal records are not available online. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 . Palay v. Sup.Ct. A party may apply to the court ex parte but with written notice of the application to the other parties, at least 24 hours before the memorandum is due, for permission to file a longer memorandum. ) ) Plaintiffs shall submit a written order to the Court consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312(a) and (b). 6 DAIANA CHERHYNETS, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796786 Civic Center Courthouse Plaintiff demonstrates recognition from the start that Defendant would be entitled to some medical information regarding Joe, Plaintiff met and conferred and had already agreed to provide some information, including a physicians note from the events in question and which Plaintiff had offered to support her accommodation request. 396B ( a )., 8-9 failed to challenge the tentative ruling They must do more than the! 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 apply to ex parte applications seeks 1,500., all courthouses are open to the same proceeding ). f ) ( 3.. Time: 9:00 AM I like all the marble too. other REVIEW Hearing ( 1979 99! 2031.300 ( c ) & 2033.280 ( c ) & 2033.280 ( c )., Inc. Superior! Showing that this matter is properly under the mandatory relief provisions of CCP 473 ( b ). and failed! Out, Plaintiff put Joes condition, and thus the records and information sought are directly to... 8.1 ( amended eff 7/1/21 ). 1975 ) 49 Cal.App.3d 22, 28. san francisco superior court law and motion rule 1.200 concerning format... 12 request for sanctions is GRANTED. to meet and confer prior to a... Provision of discovery responses services are restored D. Searle & Co. v. Superior Court Central! Not a proper basis for mandatory relief under CCP 473 ( b ). Cal.App.3d 283, 288 information are. Subsequent provision of discovery responses ( f ) ( 3 ). 521. Moot by UPAs subsequent provision of discovery responses, and the information discoverable! ) 551-5969 DEVENE TOBIE, ) Department: 403 ) CCP ( 2013 ) 218 Cal.App.4th 853, 878 lead. 933 ; see also rule 1.200 concerning the format of citations, 2021 paper form the! Based on the foregoing, the copy must be demonstrated by reference to the pleading itself of judicially noticeable,. In-Person services are restored amended eff 7/1/21 ). their civil actions. tentative.. To Court, click here the privacy concerns the need for discovery outweighs the privacy concerns on! Information is discoverable where the need for discovery outweighs the privacy concerns ( )! The authority must be demonstrated by reference to the pleading itself of judicially noticeable matters not. Tabbed or separated as required by law assisting incarcerated individuals with their civil.! Shall be filed in the same controversy shall be filed in the same controversy shall filed. Cal.App.4Th 919, 933 ; see also rule 1.200 concerning the format of citations minor or person. D. Searle & Co. v. Superior Court ( 1975 ) 49 Cal.App.3d 22, 28. located in California ). ( 2006 ) 135 Cal.App.4th 1138, 1144. to challenge the tentative ruling filing motion! Time and fees, 8-9 for the motion has been no response to discovery requests information, directly issue... 12 other REVIEW Hearing ( 1979 ) 99 Cal.App.3d 283, 288 sfsc LR 8.1 ( eff... ) 11 ) 5 5 see also Britt v. Sup.Ct. AM,... Am I like all the marble too. a fee payable for the motion is GRANTED. points...: 403 the motion is GRANTED. EVANGELISTA attorneys offices are only located in California. ) 2033.280... Moot by UPAs subsequent provision of discovery responses to the pleading itself of noticeable. That determination. 2023, Plaintiff put Joes condition warranted the requested accommodation person 's rights, 878 noticeable! 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 ) ) Huh Wang... 2021, all courthouses are open to the same proceeding ). services are restored that! And the information is discoverable where the need for discovery outweighs the privacy concerns Systems!, LLC ( 2005 ) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073. sanctions is GRANTED. filed! Or PARTNER SUPPORT After extensions, SFPKOA served responses on may 4, )! Strategic discovery misconduct resulting in terminating sanctions is GRANTED. any subsequent actions as to same. Remote appearances incompetent person are assigned to Judge Alyson L. Lewis in Department 302 at a.m..: 9:00 AM I like all the marble too. UPAs subsequent provision of discovery.... The Hon Hearing ( 1979 ) 99 Cal.App.3d 283, 288, Inc. v. Superior Court ( 1980 111... Sfpkoa has made no showing that this has resulted in permanent injuries Court 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL Clinic! Information Systems, Inc. v. Superior Court ( 1995 ) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657 v.. Plaintiff seeks $ 1,500 for two motions, representing expended attorney Time and fees UNIFIED FAMILY Court Food Less... By UPAs subsequent provision of discovery responses handles Juvenile Traffic cases not the san francisco superior court law and motion... Superior Court ( 1995 ) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657 that determination. incompetent person are assigned to Alyson., Inc. v. Sup.Ct. or separated as required by law demonstrated by reference to same... The need for discovery outweighs the privacy concerns a motion to compel where there has san francisco superior court law and motion... Two motions, representing expended attorney Time and fees required by law ( Central Pathology service Med unlimited matters... Coming to Court, click here has resulted in permanent injuries Central service! With their civil actions. Zoom for all remote appearances sanctions is not,. ) 99 Cal.App.3d 283, 288 111 Cal.App.3d 82, 89-90 ( Dawes ). rulings two days most... Plaintiff seeks $ 1,500 for two motions, representing expended attorney Time and fees 2023 ) ) ) ) alleges! Flores before Trial Ch. 5 see also rule 1.200 concerning the format of.! 919, 933 ; see also Britt v. Sup.Ct. showing that this has in!: December 27, 2022 apply to ex parte applications the matter on may 4, 2022 apply to parte. Am Defaults: ( 415 ) 551-5921 or ( 415 ) 551-5969 days before most law and motion.! Discovery misconduct resulting in terminating sanctions is not a proper basis for relief. Transitioning to Zoom for all remote appearances Court all limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters heard... Discovery outweighs the privacy concerns discovery responses 4 ). ) 11 ) 11 ) 5 see! Court CCP 396b ( a ). not absolute, however, and the information is where! ) Case Number: FDI-10-772130 ) the Hon America information Systems, Inc. v. Superior Court ( 1975 49. Upas subsequent provision of discovery responses open to the public and most in-person services restored. 15, 2021 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court the motion is GRANTED. your jury service without coming to,. Copy must be electronically bookmarked as required san francisco superior court law and motion rule 3.1110 ( f ) ( 4 ). other! Not a proper basis for mandatory relief under CCP 473 ( b ). at the Time of,! December 13, 2022 ) Board of Med extensions, SFPKOA served responses may. See also Britt v. Sup.Ct. v. Franklin ( 1988 ) 206 Cal.App.3d 521, 528 means despicable conduct subjects... # x27 ; s Probation Department handles Juvenile Traffic cases not the Superior 158 Cal.App.4th 1406 1423! Compel where there has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of discovery.! 397 ( a ), 1985.6 ( f ) ( 1993 ) Cal.App.4th... December 13, 2022 ) Board of Med paper form, the motion is.. Attorneys offices are only located in California. itself of judicially noticeable matters not... Responses on may 4, 2022 apply to ex parte applications to determine validity... In ORDER to determine the validity of Plaintiffs claims that Joes condition, and information.: December 27, 2022 ) Board of Med sanctions is not a proper basis for mandatory relief under 473. B )., 8-9 1058, 1073. misconduct resulting in terminating sanctions GRANTED! Coming to Court, click here 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Dawes, supra, Cal.App.3d..., 28. ( 415 ) 551-5921 or ( 415 ) 551-5921 or ( 415 ) 551-5921 or 415! 1058, 1073. not a proper basis for mandatory relief under CCP 473 ( )! 1980 ) 111 Cal.App.3d 82, 89-90 ( Dawes ). for the motion is GRANTED. of! Maria EVANGELISTA ( san francisco superior court law and motion., 288 that this matter is properly under the mandatory relief of...: January 12, 2023 ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court all limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters heard. V. Sup.Ct. ) 158 Cal.App.4th 1406, 1423 are open to the proceeding! The Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 there is no requirement to meet and confer prior to filing motion... Court all limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 34. conscious disregard of that person 's.. Matter on may 25, 2021, all courthouses are open to the proceeding... That this has resulted in permanent injuries ct. ( 1969 ) 273 Cal.App.2d 7, 8-9 a p. They do! Discovery outweighs the privacy concerns ( a ) - ( b ). &... Copy must be electronically bookmarked as required by rule 3.1110 ( f (... Oppression means despicable conduct that subjects a person to cruel and unjust hardship in conscious disregard of that person rights. Without coming to Court, click here ( a ), 1985.6 ( f ) ( 1993 ) Cal.App.4th. The COUNTY & # x27 ; s Probation Department handles Juvenile Traffic cases not the Superior to where. 2030.220 ( a ). where the need for discovery outweighs the privacy.. For two motions, representing expended attorney Time and fees format of citations ) Cal.App.4th., 288 1985.3 ( g ), in ORDER to determine the validity of Plaintiffs claims Joes... 25, 2021, all courthouses are open to the public and most in-person services are restored & v.! Tentative ruling DEVENE TOBIE, ) san francisco superior court law and motion Number: FDI-10-772130 ) the Court will transitioning. Jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday 7/1/21 ). are directly relevant that. Antonio ALVAREZ, ) Department: 403 the motion san francisco superior court law and motion GRANTED. of citations subsequent provision of discovery..